|
Association for Financial Professionals Applauds
Securities and Exchange Commission Report on Credit Rating Agencies
SEC's Actions Reflect Concerns Raised in a Recent Survey of Financial
Professionals
JANUARY 28, 2003 -- BETHESDA, MD -- The Association for Financial
Professionals (AFP) supports the decision by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) to further examine its oversight of rating agencies,
a move that AFP recommended to the SEC in November. The SEC's action was
disclosed in a report that was delivered to Congress on Friday, January
24.
"We are pleased that the SEC has responded to the concerns and recommendations
of our members and will be considering steps to increase its oversight
of rating agencies and stimulate competition in the market for accurate
and timely credit rating information," said Jim Kaitz, president and CEO
of AFP.
The SEC's actions are consistent with the results of AFP's
Rating Agencies Survey. According to the November 2002 survey:
- Twenty-nine percent of practitioners who work for companies with rated
debt believe that their company's ratings are inaccurate.
- Only 65 percent of the respondents who use credit ratings for investment
decisions believe the ratings are accurate.
- Most respondents do not believe changes in their company's finances
are promptly reflected in the ratings, reporting that it typically takes
up to six months for a ratings downgrade and longer for an upgrade.
- More than a quarter of practitioners working for companies that have
experienced a downgrade report that it took more than six months for
the adverse changes to be reflected in their ratings.
Kaitz shared the results of the AFP survey during a November 21 SEC hearing.
Other findings state that nearly two-thirds of corporate financial professionals
believe the SEC should clarify the procedures it uses for recognizing
rating agencies, while almost three-quarters believe the SEC should periodically
review the rating agencies it recognizes. Also, most respondents indicate
that recognition of additional agencies would improve the quality of ratings
and its timeliness. Forty-eight percent of corporate practitioners
believe that additional choices for rating agencies would increase accuracy
when assessing corporate credit risk.
"We look forward to working with the SEC to develop rules that will improve
the quality of the information credit rating agencies provide for the
benefit of issuers and investors in the United States securities markets,"
said Kaitz.
The SEC report, which examines the role and function of credit rating
agencies in the operation of the securities market, was required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The report states that the SEC will further
examine issues identified during its preparation of the report, including
potential barriers to entry to the market for credit ratings and the SEC's
ongoing oversight of rating agencies. The report further stated that the
SEC will propose rules within 60 days and solicit public comment.
The Association for Financial Professionals in Bethesda, Maryland, supports
more than 14,000 individual members from a wide range of industries throughout
all stages of their careers in various aspects of treasury and financial
management. AFP is the preferred resource for financial professionals
for continuing education, financial tools and publications, career development,
certifications, research, representation to legislators and regulators,
and the development of industry standards.
|